| lkcl | programmerjake, please can you follow the process i set out six months ago, regarding communication of intent | 01:31 |
|---|---|---|
| lkcl | "i am thinking of doing X, is that ok" - WAIT FOR A RESPONSE | 01:31 |
| lkcl | "i am starting X, please confirm" - WAIT FOR A RESPONSE | 01:32 |
| lkcl | "i am doing X, please review" - WAIT FOR FEEDBACK | 01:33 |
| lkcl | "i have completed X, please review" - ENGAGE IN FEEDBACK | 01:33 |
| lkcl | i've removed aaallll of the tables that you spent time on where you had rushed ahead without informing me of your intentions | 01:34 |
| lkcl | where i had *already said no* to moving the identification bits around | 01:34 |
| lkcl | and the decision even to embed 32-bit within PO9 is *not finalised* | 01:35 |
| lkcl | please please *engage*, "ask for clearance to proceed" before spending vast amounts of time on a task. | 01:36 |
| programmerjake | I did inform you on tuesday iirc, and I explained why your stated reasons for saying no no longer apply (comment #27). please add the tables back, they are intended to spark conversation, not be a "this is what we're doing no questions allowed" | 01:36 |
| lkcl | you know this | 01:36 |
| programmerjake | also, it was like 1hr, so imho time well spent sparking conversation | 01:37 |
| programmerjake | not wasting a massive amount of time | 01:37 |
| programmerjake | (also explained in comment #20) | 01:38 |
| lkcl | i'm not going to repeat this again. | 01:38 |
| lkcl | i REQUIRE that you follow the process i have described for the second time | 01:39 |
| programmerjake | well, I have an appointment, so sorry gtg | 01:39 |
| programmerjake | (i'll note you didn't follow that process either afaict, because it is slow) | 01:40 |
| programmerjake | i'm available again, i'm dropping the Rc issue since it's not that important, we can just do the additional work | 04:25 |
| programmerjake | i'll note that, assuming po9 is the only primary opcode we can use, using part of it for 32-bit instructions shouldn't slow down length decode by more than 1 gate latency since the gates needed anyway for comparing against po1/9 take enough time that a parallel decode of a few additional bits can be done and combined in a final and-or gate: is_64 = is_po1 | (is_po9 & extra_bits_match) | 04:31 |
| *** ghostmansd <ghostmansd!~ghostmans@broadband-109-173-83-100.ip.moscow.rt.ru> has joined #libre-soc | 09:18 | |
| *** ghostmansd <ghostmansd!~ghostmans@broadband-109-173-83-100.ip.moscow.rt.ru> has quit IRC | 09:30 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!