| lkcl | cesar: :) | 10:24 |
|---|---|---|
| lkcl | it was about time | 10:24 |
| lkcl | https://twitter.com/happyautomata/status/1439366636415250435 | 10:36 |
| lkcl | haha | 10:36 |
| Las[m] | lkcl: What version of litedram are you using? | 11:49 |
| lkcl | Las[m], everything will be around the timestamp of when i was working on ls180 | 12:14 |
| lkcl | Date: Fri Aug 7 23:14:09 2020 +0200 | 12:14 |
| lkcl | commit 198bcbab676e2b4065e5b6a7dc8a7733bae8315a | 12:14 |
| lkcl | urrr... | 12:16 |
| lkcl | the expectation - not explained *at all* - is that litex_setup.py should be *altered* (specifically adapted, by you, and maintained as an *out-of-tree fork*) | 12:17 |
| lkcl | and the sha1 checksums added | 12:17 |
| Las[m] | lkcl: Yeah I kind of assumed that it was something like that | 12:19 |
| Las[m] | I've gathered the hashes of the commits where the timestamp is <= the timestamp of the tagged commit | 12:19 |
| Las[m] | Practically, this means it's quite hard for an outsider to build Libre-SOC right now, because you'd have to find the right commits for every LiteX repository yourself..;. | 12:20 |
| lkcl | Las[m], can you please submit a bugreport because that's really important | 12:41 |
| lkcl | put the commits in it | 12:41 |
| Las[m] | Sure. | 12:42 |
| Las[m] | lkcl: I think I need an account on Bugzilla? | 12:43 |
| Las[m] | https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700 | 14:04 |
| Las[m] | lkcl: Have you tried running ls180soc.py lately? I am getting odd errors that seem to be simple mistakes in the program itself, not an issue with my packaging, though I may be wrong of course. | 17:22 |
| Las[m] | Specifically, I get an error inside LiteX at https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=litex.git;a=blob;f=litex/build/io.py;h=8e93d19bd277ab55e332e81aa99a979b639c241c;hb=HEAD#l67, because it passes one argument too many. | 17:23 |
| Las[m] | I have a feeling that you're not actually using the tag, because this is fixed in 9950e7 on 2020-08-22... | 17:42 |
| Las[m] | Yep, using a slightly newer LiteX version fixes it... | 17:49 |
| Las[m] | I actually got it to build | 17:49 |
| Las[m] | lkcl: How do you want me to contribute patches to Libre-SOC? | 17:53 |
| Las[m] | Do you do PRs or do you use a patch-based workflow? | 17:54 |
| lkcl | Las[m]: "fixed" with this | 18:27 |
| lkcl | https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700#c2 | 18:27 |
| lkcl | i just didn't commit it. | 18:27 |
| lkcl | nice! | 18:27 |
| lkcl | i just give people direct access to git.libre-soc.org gitolite3 repos | 18:28 |
| lkcl | send me an ssh public key and i'll add you | 18:28 |
| Las[m] | Sure. | 18:28 |
| lkcl | Las[m]: i've added you to the wiki repo which you can test-commit to | 18:35 |
| lkcl | https://libre-soc.org/HDL_workflow/#gitolite3_access | 18:35 |
| lkcl | *be careful* when ssh'ing to git.libre-soc.org | 18:35 |
| lkcl | the fail2ban rules are quite draconian, to keep port-scanning at bay | 18:36 |
| lkcl | which is of the order of hundreds of ssh accesses a day | 18:36 |
| Las[m] | Thanks, will do! | 18:37 |
| Las[m] | lkcl: Wasn't it using a non-standard port? | 19:12 |
| Las[m] | 992? | 19:13 |
| Las[m] | 922? | 19:13 |
| Las[m] | Ah nevermind, I just noticed it's on the wiki | 19:15 |
| Las[m] | I can pull at least! | 19:18 |
| Las[m] | Can also commit. | 19:19 |
| cesar | lkcl: The multiplication unit test (src/soc/fu/mul/test/test_pipe_caller.py) seems to fail on mulli, mulhd, mulhdu and mulhwu. Is this expected? | 23:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!